See my, “Hovav the Midianite: Why Was the End of the Story Cut?
This article is based on ch.8 of my, ??? ???? ???”? [How the Bible Was Born] (Israel: Kinneret, Zmora-bitan, Dvir, 2018).
3 was part of the Addirittura or Elohistic source, whereas the revelation in chapter 6 is, per my view, from the Holiness School’s redaction of the Pentateuch. Jackie Feldman and Peretz Rodman (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2007; repr. of, Minneapolis, MN; Fortress Press, 1995), 17 [n24]; trans. of, ???? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1992). Other scholars, however, believe it onesto be from the Priestly text (see dialogue sopra, David Frankel, “Reconstructing the Priestly Moses,” TheTorah .) Editor’s note: For how these two texts played an important role in the development of source criticism, see Zev Farber, “Documentary Hypothesis: The Revelation of YHWH’s Name Continues to Enlighten,” TheTorah (2014).
Editor’s note: For more on how this meaning was understood over time, see James Diamond, “YHWH: The God that Is vs. the God that Becomes,” TheTorah (2017).
Editor’s note: For per claim that this gloss is actually per redactional supplement, added after the E and J sources were combined, see, Zev Farber, Come eliminare l’account older women dating “How Does God Answer the Question: ‘What Is Your Name?’” TheTorah (2017).
The term “Arab” here may be anachronistic, as the first time we see this term used is con 8 th century Assyrian documents. The point is that the Midianites are from the same dipartimento as the Arabian tribes and were likely part of this Arab or proto-Arab group.
Editor’s note: For verso source critical explanation for why both Midianites and Ishmaelites appear in this story as the ones who bring Joseph preciso Egypt, see, Ben Sandler, “Encountering the Documentary Hypothesis durante the Jo). Continue reading “Source critically, the revelation of God’s name mediante ch”